Where SSO Falls Short in Protecting SaaS


enhanced by two-factor authentication. This eliminates the risk of weak passwords, reuse or sharing of passwords, and reduces the likelihood of successful phishing attacks. With SSO, the risk of cyber-attacks is reduced as users can quickly and securely access multiple applications without having to repeatedly enter login information. meet strict regulatory requirements through the use of MFA. Additionally, a large majority of cyber attacks, around 61%, are initiated through stolen login information. Eliminating the need for passwords and usernames can decrease the likelihood of such attacks and improve overall security. With SSO, companies can not only secure their accounts but also meet compliance regulations more easily. Show that they have completed the essential measures to fulfill regulatory obligations.

While Single Sign-On (SSO) is crucial in safeguarding Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) applications and their information, it is insufficient to rely solely on SSOs to secure the entire SaaS system. Having SSOs alone cannot stop malicious attackers from gaining access into a SaaS app, nor can it defend against SaaS apps that are not approved by the IT department. Understanding or consent.

To ensure the protection of important data in their SaaS framework, organizations must take extra measures. Below are five examples where relying solely on SSO is inadequate.

Companies Are NOT Enforcing SSO-Only Login

, most organizations rely on employees to manually manage their own passwords, leaving room for security vulnerabilities. Despite the availability and benefits of SSO integration, many companies are not fully utilizing this tool to enhance their security measures. The majority of SaaS applications can be connected to a Single Sign-On system, and many businesses have adopted this feature. According to our studies, an astonishing 95% of companies let their workers use SSO for logging into Salesforce. However, less than 5% of firms mandate the use of SSO login. Instead of employing a reliable and secure access control mechanism, most organizations depend on their employees to handle passwords themselves- a practice that inherently presents security risks. Although SSO integration is accessible and advantageous, numerous businesses do not take full advantage of this feature in order to improve their security protocols. Employees are given the ability to log into their SaaS account using their own unique login information, consisting of a username and password.

One way for companies to increase the effectiveness of SSO is by getting rid of access through local credentials. If companies still allow access with local credentials, they can still fall prey to attackers who steal these credentials and use them to log in undetected.

Admins Require Non-SSO Access

In companies where single sign-on is mandatory, it is still necessary for administrators to have the ability to access the application directly through a username and password. This is because most applications require admin login privileges to quickly address any problems that may arise with the SSO system.

An issue of significant concern is the fact that obtaining Admin access is highly sought after by individuals who pose a threat. If such information is acquired, cyber criminals are able to gain complete control over the app instance, which enables them to do things such as create new user accounts and download or encrypt data they can hold hostage. Businesses that depend on SSO as the only means of safeguarding their SaaS systems may be caught off guard by unauthorized access to administrative accounts through the use of login credentials such as usernames and passwords.

SSO Can't Help with Over-Permissioned or Malicious Third-Party Applications

additional permissions that may pose a security risk. Despite the potential danger, many organizations continue to use these apps without thoroughly vetting their security measures. This highlights the importance of carefully evaluating third-party applications before allowing them to access sensitive data. Although many of these integrations offer benefits, precautions must be taken to ensure they do not compromise the overall security of the system. Devices that provide the ability to create, view, and remove documents and electronic messages.

From time to time, certain linked applications may be harmful and make use of the limited permissions to steal or code confidential data present in the app.

Single sign-ons (SSOs) are not able to see the authorization levels or capabilities of third-party applications. Consequently, they cannot notify security teams or the creators of those apps if they pose a threat to the company.

SSOs Should Work with a SaaS Security Posture Management Solution (SSPM)

Security is most effective when using both SSO and SSPM solutions in conjunction. This approach allows for a comprehensive Identity and Access Governance strategy, which includes removing access for users who no longer require it. SSO manages access control and is a critical component of Identity and Access Management for SaaS applications. prevention. Security posture management solutions, such as Adaptive Shield, offer more than just access control. They provide added layers of protection for vulnerable aspects of SSOs. These solutions also identify misconfigurations, recognize third-party applications that are connected, and identify hygiene issues with devices to prevent data loss. I am sorry, this request does not make sense. The given paragraph seems to be missing. Kindly provide the relevant information so that I can assist you better.

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post